|
JulieYassa09 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hey I was wondering if this study was done by an orginial psychologist? Who was it and what was the orginial study called? please let me know as I am trying to replicate it thank you
scamsr11 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this is amazing =]
NoMorThanMost (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Androgenicus
Exactly!
NoMorThanMost (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I always hated these kinds of experiments to try and prove sexism as a social construct. They are poorly controlled and don't account for other social factors that affect behavior.
racinggreg2011 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@EmmTrain the point up the experiment was to c how many were going to follow the signs as if they were being told that's what they have to do like if a woman should be a housewife instead of having a job and making more money than a man
EmmTrain (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Interesting.
Do they realize the door leads to the same place?
jalbador (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
What the should have done was put up a ink blot with the line through it (like the no parking sign) on one door and a different ink blot on the other door.
Androgenicus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I am not sure this experiment is valid. Here, you are given signs by an institution (in which you are walking into). You are not making choice, the institution made it. This is a "trust" thing. Although the absurd is obvious and these doors make no sense, maybe if I walk through the wrong one I will suffer repercussions.
NoDadNotTheBelt (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This is just like the signs on bathrooms. Males don't go into the females' washroom and females don't go into the males' washroom.
39533 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@chaz2290 they would probably walk in the gender door that they were born with and then walk out the other gender door lol |